In many nations, a small number of people earn high salaries. Some people believe this is good for the country, but others think governments should not allow salaries above a certain level. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Table of Contents
Sample Answer:
The pay divide in many nations is evident from the difference in the standard of living. However, perceiving the high remuneration cap will always have different opinions. On the one hand, some employees earning high wages can boost their motivation and offer apt returns for their skills. Also, companies can attract highly skilled individuals due to attractive salary packages.
On the contrary, it is also valid to introduce limits on earnings. This will decrease the pay disparity between top-level executives and general employees. As a result, the notion of equality can lead to a healthier and more collaborative economy.
Hence, setting a cap to limit wages can prove beneficial in the long run.
2. Many governments think that economic advancement is their most vital goal. However, some think other types of progress are equally crucial for a country. Discuss both views and offer your insights.
Sample Answer:
A country’s progress is often a subjective topic. Economic advancement is crucial for a nation’s stability and rise. However, other aspects also play a pivotal role in the overall enhancement.
The signs of a healthy economy are clear — job generation, better remuneration, and decent purchasing power. And low fiscal deficits allow governments to spend economic resources on infrastructure.
On the other hand, topics like social justice, human rights, law, gender equality, and nature preservation complete a well-balanced country. Also, the happiness of people is dependent on most of these factors. After we discuss both views, it is apparent that a nation needs to advance steadily in different facets.
In conclusion, governments should pay equal attention to all segments for consistent development.
3. Some people believe that all university-going students should pursue education in whatever they like. Other people believe they should only be permitted to study modules that will be beneficial shortly, such as those related to science and technology. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Sample Answer:
The thinking of constricting education to a specific domain can hamper a person’s creativity. People who opine in favor of offering academic flexibility to students emphasize the passion of distinct individuals.
On the contrary, a section of the population believes in the relevancy of a study domain. The technological advancements require professionals who are adept in STEM courses. Hence, they support aligning education around the science and technology sector.
In my opinion, when we discuss both views, it is crucial to decide on the practicality. If students study their area of interest, the chances of gaining career satisfaction are high. Also, society can benefit due to the contribution of professionals following their innate interests. Nobody can predict the future relevancy of technical or creative courses.
STEM programs can offer more job opportunities due to our reliance on technology. However, forcing students to pursue such courses can lead to losing interest and hamper career satisfaction. After analyzing both views, I believe the current system, which emphasizes flexibility and freedom of choice, is sensible.
Finally, the world will never cease admiring artists, literature, and music. Also, domains like accounting and agriculture will always stay relevant. Hence, it is better to allow students to choose their preferred study area.
Read More: IELTS Writing Task 2 | Writing Task 1 IELTS |
4. Some people think that a sense of competitiveness in children should be encouraged. Others believe that children trained to cooperate rather than compete become better adults. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Sample Answer:
For the longest time, people have believed in encouraging their children to enter a dynamic competition. Be it academics, sports, or other co-curricular events, healthy competition can motivate children immensely.
For instance, rewards or trophies of appreciation ignite the fuel in children to give their best in every event. This healthy rivalry can transform students into their best versions. Resultantly, such individuals enter higher education and professional workplaces as well-rounded people. Hence, the case for encouraging student competition is valid.
On the other hand, values like cooperation can instill the attributes of teamwork. Also, the absence of competition can improve and build rapport. Organizations prefer a collaborative atmosphere to grow as a unit in the modern age. Hence, children can learn to gain more through such a positive outlook.
I do not disagree with people highlighting the value of competitiveness. However, after assessing both views, I am inclined to support the spirit of cooperation.
5. Some people think museums should be enjoyable spots to entertain people, while others believe that the purpose of museums is to educate. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Sample Answer:
People have distinct views on the end scope of museums. These places should be entertaining as well as educating.
Museums are tourist attractions that portray specific eras' culture, history, and belongings. More educational content can disinterest an average visitor. However, visually appealing museums with technological features can be enjoyable.
Focusing primarily on education can give visitors an in-depth understanding of specific topics. Detailed commentary, specialized guides, and historical lessons can prove helpful to avid history enthusiasts.
Still, in the long run, museums should find the balance to entertain and educate visitors. People should find it interesting to witness the objects and learn historically accurate information simultaneously.
Read more about: Tips For Reading in IELTS Exam | IELTS Academic Reading | IELTS Reading Tips And Tricks | IELTS Reading Band Score | IELTS General Reading Test | IELTS Reading Section